©2017 Horton, Dowd, Bartschi & Levesque, PC

Featured Posts

Welcome to our Appellate & Ethics Blog!

This blog will sometimes be scholarly, sometimes purely practical, and sometimes just musings by members of the firm on life in the appellate courts and on professional responsibility.

When we comment on cases, we do so with care, but you should always read the cases yourself before using them for any reason.

When one of us muses on matters, it may or may not reflect the innermost thoughts of the others. Feel free to ask.

If we talk about a case in which we represented a party, we’ll let you know it was ours.

We welcome suggestions, to a point, on relevant topics of interest and comments on the thoughts and suggestions we include on this blog.

But most of all, we hope that you learn from and enjoy these entries!

August 22, 2019

This time each year, I review cases from the past year for possible inclusion in the West Annotation of the Superior Court Civil Rules.*  There are often splits of authority amongst trial courts in the application or interpretation of the Practice Book rules.  As I res...

August 5, 2019

I'm paraphrasing.  But that was essentially what Judge Christopher Droney of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals told a room full of appellate litigators at our last meeting of the Connecticut Bar Association's Appellate Advocacy Section.  Why?  Because no one will eve...

June 25, 2019

Ten years ago I wrote an article ranking the justices on the Connecticut Supreme Court who had sat in the 1980s and 1990s from 1 to 16. I thought I would take another look at my rankings and see if I still rank those 16 justices in the same order.

What follows is my rev...

April 2, 2019

In recognition of the upcoming Appellate Advocacy Institute (register here), Attorney Horton shares with us his memories from his own first appellate oral argument.  Enjoy!

In my 48 years of practice, I have orally argued 130 appeals to the Connecticut Supreme Court. Th...

February 5, 2018

            Every case is important, no matter how small.  And the Appellate Court’s decision in Cusano v. Lajoie, 178 Conn. App. 605, (2017), makes clear that generally the jury’s award of damages should stand, ev...

March 30, 2017

Last time, I said that Buxton v. Ullman, 147 Conn. 48 (1959), one of the four infamous contraception decisions leading up to Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), was the third worst decision in the history of the Connecticut Supreme Court. Today I report on th...

Please reload

Recent Posts

December 24, 2019

Please reload

Archive
Please reload

Search By Tags